PRETORIA, South Africa—Oscar Pistorius tottered on his stumps before a South African court as his main legal advisor said the previous competitor's homicide trial had made a progression of "genuine adversaries" as well known confusions. Barry Roux requested that his customer expel his prostheses and stroll on his stumps under the steady gaze of Judge Thokozile Masipa amid the hearing which will decide Mr. Pistorius' sentence for executing sweetheart Reeva Steenkamp in 2013. The previous Paralympic champion is confronting 15 years in prison, yet Mr. Roux contended that he merits a more tolerant sentence. In his last contentions to Judge Masipa, Mr. Roux asked Mr. Pistorius to evacuate his prosthetic appendages to expose one of the "foes" of the case—saw false impressions around the litigant's thought processes and portability when he shot Ms. Steenkamp different times through a latrine work area entryway in his home three years prior. Mr. Roux told the court it was not the "solid, aspiring" Mr. Pistorius, the history-production Olympic runner and different Paralympic gold medalist, who discharged four shots that night. Or maybe, it was a crippled man remaining on his stumps and in trepidation for his life, his lawyer contended. "It was not the man winning gold awards that must be judged," the barrier legal counselor said. "[Popular conviction proposes it] is a 1.85-meter man remaining on his stumps at 3 o'clock in the morning oblivious that must be judged." Later, Mr. Roux said: "They need to see Oscar Pistorius rushing to the lavatory with his gold decoration around his neck." Mr. Roux contended that the indictment's assertion of an uproarious battle between Mr. Pistorius and his better half before the shooting had never been demonstrated. The legal advisor additionally said individuals trusted his customer was sentenced murder for purposefully slaughtering Ms. Steenkamp, despite the fact that the decision didn't say that Mr. Pistorius knew it was his better half behind the entryway. The competitor has dependably guaranteed he mixed up her for a gatecrasher. The legal advisor said "generous and convincing circumstances" existed that would permit the judge to go astray from the base term of 15 years in jail for homicide in South Africa. He additionally alluded to another prominent case in South Africa, in which a rugby player who shot dead his little girl in the wake of mixing up her for an interloper was not indicted. Mr. Roux's request to Judge Masipa took after the confirmation of the last observer at the listening to, a cousin of Ms. Steenkamp, who denounced Mr. Pistorius himself of not giving the "genuine form" of the shooting. The cousin, Kim Martin, likewise censured the litigant for not affirming at the current week's sentencing hearing but rather consenting to a TV meeting that will be show after the listening to closes. "I believe it's extremely unjustifiable to need to converse with the world about your rendition when you had the open door in court to do as such," Martin said under addressing from boss prosecutor Gerrie Nel. Ms. Martin likewise scrutinized Pistorius' announcement that he slaughtered Steenkamp by oversight thinking a gatecrasher was in the house. "All we've ever needed is reality," Martin said. "Individuals say we have reality, however we didn't. Oscar's rendition has changed such a large number of times. I don't feel the genuine adaptation turned out." Mr. Pistorius is presently living under house capture after at first serving one year of a five-year jail sentence for homicide for shooting his better half numerous times in 2013. That conviction was upset a year ago by a claims court, which sentenced the previous Paralympic champion of the more genuine allegation of homicide.